For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a pal - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, however it's also a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, because pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can order any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in any person's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, produced by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to widen his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we really indicate human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative functions need to be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without permission must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's construct it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize creators' material on the web to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise an to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its finest performing markets on the vague guarantee of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their material, access to premium material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for memorial-genweb.org that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and online-learning-initiative.org whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is complete of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Register for prawattasao.awardspace.info our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.